[REQ] All texture creators gather here! There's an important thing to discuss!
Navigation
Share this page
BDcraft on Twitter
BDcraft on Facebook
Partners
What is this?
For starters I want to say that a lot of people nowdays have a very good/awesome PC's. As I have started a thread for Tekkit addon pack, there were some people saying "Why don't you make this pack higher res?". So that's why I started this thread!
Ok, so what do you want?
I think all of us agree that tekkit/technic is so advanced now and that because of many mods it has, it lags. But fear no more. As of Minecraft 1.3.2 I've noticed a huge boost in performance. Before, on Minecraft 1.2.5, I had to use 64x texture pack and had to put render distance to short. And back then I used Optifine as well. But now without Optifine (just MCPatcher) I can easily run 128x texture packs and I can put render distance to Far and it just won't lag. I didn't upgrade my PC a tiny bit.
Get to the point!
Ok, if you insist. Once Tekkit gets Minecraft 1.3.2 we should see a marked improvement performance vise. So I think we should start making higher res textures instead of only 128x. It's easier to work with and also better looking! I think we all agree on that. And if you can't test these out there are tons of testers ready to help you. You just need to ask politely!



Like this site? Share it. ;)






Comments
16 September, 2012 - 13:28
#1

HanFox
Offline







Joined: 16/04/2012
BDcraft forum moderator - "No power in the 'verse can stop me." 
Top
- Login or register to post comments
16 September, 2012 - 13:58
#2

crumbl3d
Offline





Joined: 14/07/2012
HanFox wrote: Most texturers usually work with vectors and can easily scale up or down.
Top
- Login or register to post comments
16 September, 2012 - 23:34
#3

Timmie3054
Offline




Joined: 25/04/2012
Top
- Login or register to post comments
16 September, 2012 - 23:39
#4

SPARKST3R
Offline






Joined: 30/04/2012
Timmie3054 wrote: ...Spankster...
Top
- Login or register to post comments
17 September, 2012 - 03:58
#5

FuzzyPurp
Offline



Joined: 16/02/2012
Top
- Login or register to post comments
17 September, 2012 - 14:43
#6

crumbl3d
Offline





Joined: 14/07/2012
FuzzyPurp wrote: Why is there multiple threads for tekkit? including this one.
But isn't it better to work with vectors. Because in future (far far future
) Minecraft may become better so it's easier to scale up the vectors instead of redoing all the textures.
Top
- Login or register to post comments
17 September, 2012 - 14:53
#7

HanFox
Offline







Joined: 16/04/2012
BDcraft forum moderator - "No power in the 'verse can stop me." 
Top
- Login or register to post comments
17 September, 2012 - 16:53
#8

crumbl3d
Offline





Joined: 14/07/2012
HanFox wrote: The thing is, as I said, most of do use vector tools. We just don't release higher than 128x.
Top
- Login or register to post comments
17 September, 2012 - 18:29
#9

Timmie3054
Offline




Joined: 25/04/2012
Top
- Login or register to post comments
17 September, 2012 - 18:33
#10

SPARKST3R
Offline






Joined: 30/04/2012
Timmie3054 wrote: But, like I said, over 80% of the fan made content use samples from the 128x pack. So even if people use vector tools, they will never be able to scale them up since the samples they use are no longer in vector form.
Mwahahahaha
Top
- Login or register to post comments
- 1
- 2
- next ›
- last »
Most texturers usually work with vectors and can easily scale up or down.
I can say IC2 and Forestry (if Forestry gets back in to Tekkit) will probably never have a fully functional 512x/256x without a lot of work because the vast majority of their original unflattened texture files have been lost.
So that could mean any other mod which uses those textures as a base will probably not get high resolution releases either.
However, I do believe you're jumping the gun a little bit anyway. Sure 1.3.2 is meant to improve performance a lot, but it won't for everyone and then when you add another ton of mods from the Tekkit pack the hit may still stop people getting past 128x at all.
Surely it's better to wait and see then to open a debate which could be redundant?
I can say IC2 and Forestry (if Forestry gets back in to Tekkit) will probably never have a fully functional 512x/256x without a lot of work because the vast majority of their original unflattened texture files have been lost.
So that could mean any other mod which uses those textures as a base will probably not get high resolution releases either.
However, I do believe you're jumping the gun a little bit anyway. Sure 1.3.2 is meant to improve performance a lot, but it won't for everyone and then when you add another ton of mods from the Tekkit pack the hit may still stop people getting past 128x at all.
Surely it's better to wait and see then to open a debate which could be redundant?
I agree that we should wait until tekkit updates but at least convert some textures to vector as they are easier to work with!
To be honest, I have 2 GTX 580s in SLI and a third gen i7 and I can barely run 512x. I get like 10fps. So I don't even see the point in making 512x textures.
Also, we don't need to make higher res textures. We just need to make our textures at 128x using strictly vector tools. This will allow us to upscale the textures if we needed to.
The only problem with this is. Most of us use samples from the 128x Sphax Texture pack. The samples we take are already rasterized so we can not scale them up without losing quality.
Its pretty tough to ask us to make vector based textures from scratch.
So the only solution to this, is working with the 512x Sphax texture pack, and use samples from that. Spankster seems to like doing this. I however do not.
Moral of the story is. 128x is perfectly fine. Its the recommended texture size anyways.
Still calling me spankster even after like 5 months :3
Im also known as Duck5200 in some far reaches of the internetamabob
Urm MANGOES
Why is there multiple threads for tekkit? including this one.
- This isn't about tekkit. I just made an example. It's about textures you creators make. I agree with Timmie that we really don't need 512x. I exaggerated a bit
- And about tekkit threads. I would like to see Ecsport's and other threads deleted hence there are dead. I and obsidiben made two threads but we may work together in future. It is yet to be seen!
PS: I'm sorry about the pm's. You are getting all of them because I sent the first one to you at the same time. I can delete it if you want!
The thing is, as I said, most of do use vector tools. We just don't release higher than 128x.
I also pointed out a lot of old textures no longer have their vector files available due to them being done by other people who have since lost said files and aren't really active in the community any longer.
I also pointed out a lot of old textures no longer have their vector files available due to them being done by other people who have since lost said files and aren't really active in the community any longer.
If there is any need to release higher res textures just upscale the vector files! I totally agree with you! "And on that bombshell it's time to end"
But, like I said, over 80% of the fan made content use samples from the 128x pack. So even if people use vector tools, they will never be able to scale them up since the samples they use are no longer in vector form.
Although.... if you use 512 samples and make 512 textures and scle down it would be fine
Im also known as Duck5200 in some far reaches of the internetamabob
Urm MANGOES