If you like our work please consider becoming a Supporter and get an ad-free experience.
If it was definitely easier to use a cloud storage solution copy.com is meant to be without bandwidth limits.
Also if you're invited to a share the share is spread across everyone's account instead of everyone mirroring it or someone bearing all the files themselves.
copy.com starts with 15GB free and then 5GB "referral" from the website's creator. Every additional referral is 5GB for both you and who you refer. So it's damn easy to beat the measly sums Dropbox gives out even just within a trusted few "admins" of the share
It does display PSDs but they go a little odd looking.
The only thing missing that'd be overly useful is the ability to tag though and surely that's the main reason for making a repo at all? For it to be easily searchable? Unless someone can make some sort of index of the shares, too if copy's API allows for that. In the very least then you could use a page to search for "ore" and it'd come back with anything which had ore in its filename...
Seems a little convoluted ^.^;;